Feedburner

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Thursday, October 08, 2009

US Judge Rules Against Compulsory Vaccinations

US Judge Rules Against Compulsory Vaccinations
http://sirianrevelations.net/wordpress/2009/09/08/us-judge-rules-against-compulsory-vaccinations

30 years after compulsory vaccination became US Law: US Court issues an
injunction to stop it and to hold the government and the drug companies
responsible for reactions.

A Preliminary Injunction to stop mandatory vaccinations has been issued in the

United States District Court of New Jersey. This comes after a federal lawsuit

opposing forced vaccines was filed in that court by Tim Vawter, pro se attorney,

on July 31st with the federal goverment as defendant.


When the judge signs the Preliminary Injunction, it will stop the federal

government from forcing anyone in any state to take flu vaccine against their will.

It will also prevent a state or local government from forcibly vaccinating anyone,

and forbid any person who is not vaccinated from being denied any services or

constitutional rights.

Vawter’s filings included a Complaint, and several pages of evidentiary Exhibits.

Vawter’s legal papers have been written not only for filing in federal court, but

additionally so they can be looked at by activists around the world for ideas on

filing lawsuits in their own countries to help stop forced vaccinations.

Vawter believes that as the truth of the dangers of flu vaccines continues to

become known, banning the forced use of them will eventually succeed on a

worldwide basis. He cautions people to avoid fear and keep themselves focused on

the task of blocking forced vaccination.

Preliminary Injunction will immediately halt mandatory vaccinations in the

U.S. The Court, having heard the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and read

the papers in its support, states in the Preliminary Injunction that it appears the

federal government has engaged in some amount of negligence with regards to

failure to properly investigate the safety of the flu vaccines scheduled for use in

late 2009-2010, and the evidence submitted does warrant a more thorough

investigation into the safety of the flu vaccines.


The Court ordered that the government shall be forbidden from forcing any person

to be required to take any influenza vaccination against that person's free will and

free choice. The government will not allow any state or local government, or any

party, to force any person to be required to take any influenza vaccination against

that person’s free will and free choice.

U.S. government is sued for gross negligence and violation of the Constitution

In his Cause of Action, Vawter charged that the federal government has engaged in

gross negligence by funding and promoting flu vaccines that are proven to be

dangerous and manufactured with little oversight.

The vaccines scheduled for use in late 2009 and 2010 contain heavy metals

including thimerosal mercury, which have been proven to cause autism in

children with lowered immune systems, and other dangerous and toxic

ingredients.

The federal government has stated it will force these flu vaccines onto the

American public against their will, under a document signed by Health and

Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.

He further charged that the vaccine makers stand to earn billions of dollars

selling vaccines, and are already spending tens of millions advertising a “Phase 6

Pandemic” that the evidence shows does not really exist. The federal government

has not required the World Health Organization (WHO) to show evidence of such a

pandemic. There has been no collection of facts, sworn testimony, witnesses being

questioned, hearings being held, or lie detector tests being given when

preposterous statements have been made. The WHO declared a massive “Phase 6

Influenza Pandemic”, even though only a few hundred people worldwide had so far

died of this swine flu virus, and when far more people die each year of regular flu.

Vawter noted there is a preponderance of evidence to show that the federal

government so poorly trained its employees that they eagerly agreed with the

unsubstantiated claims of the WHO in the face of evidence to the contrary.

Forced vaccination would violate the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution by

allowing the government to enter homes and force people to be vaccinated, or to

forcibly remove people to another location for vaccination. It would also violate

Fifth Amendment Constitutional rights by depriving people of liberty without due

process of law.

Vawter charged that the federal government has engaged in gross negligence

by failing to properly investigate factual evidence submitted by esteemed medical

professions over many years which proves flu vaccines have caused serious damage

to people. The CDC has stated that thimerosal mercury is being used in the flu

vaccines being prepared.

The government has failed to investigate profiteering. Billions of dollars in vaccine

sales can cause organizations to falsify threats so as to cause unwarranted public hysteria leading to forced vaccinations.

The government is guilty of gross negligence because its employees failed to

properly investigate the release of a case of live swine flu virus.

One of the main companies the government deals with, Baxter Vaccines, was apparently involved in the transporting of live bird flu virus that was released on a public train earlier this year.

A lab technician with the Swiss National Center for Influenza in Geneva had

travelled to Zurich to collect eight ampoules, five of which were filled with the

H1N1 swine flu virus. However, failure of the dry ice in their container allowed

pressure to build up, and the ampoules exploded as the train was pulling into a

station.

The highly reputable UK newspaper “the Telegraph” reported on July 2nd that
flu vaccines tested on homeless people caused twenty-one of them to die.


Vawter charged there is a preponderance of evidence to show that government

will not provide people being vaccinated with a list of the vaccine ingredients and

possible negative side effects before they are vaccinated. Most of the public will

not know this flu vaccine contains thimerosal mercury. Vawter submitted an

Order to force the government to publish vaccine ingredients and side effects, and

to give this information to everyone who takes a flu vaccine, and to do so at least 3

days prior to their vaccination. A denial of this order would violate Plaintiff's

rights to demand the government obey the First Amendment of the U.S.

Constitution by requiring it to engage in freedom of speech. The First Amendment

not only allows a citizen to have freedom of speech himself, but it allows a citizen

to demand his government engage in freedom of speech when it is promoting the

use of such as these vaccinations to the public.

The government proclamation stating a person cannot sue for any damages he

receives from the flu vaccine, completely bypasses the congress and the court

system in violation of the Seventh Amendment of the Constitution which grants

the right to sue to recover for damages. Vawter submitted an Order to deem

unconstitutional any proclamation, rule or similar law that forbids people from

suing for damages resulting from the vaccines of 2009 and 2010.

Robert O. Young, Ph.D., D.Sc.

No comments: